Kreeft calls the word interesting: that all purpose meaningless euphemism

Kreeft calls the word interesting: that all purpose meaningless euphemism

Peter Kreeft, a renowned philosopher and theologian, has often criticized the use of the word "interesting" as a meaningless euphemism. In his writings and lectures, Kreeft argues that the word is overused and lacks substance, serving as a placeholder for genuine engagement and critical thinking.

Kreeft believes that the word "interesting" has become a crutch in modern discourse, allowing people to avoid truly engaging with ideas or concepts. Instead of offering thoughtful analysis or critique, individuals often default to labeling something as "interesting" without delving deeper into its implications or significance. This, Kreeft argues, is a disservice to intellectual inquiry and hinders meaningful dialogue.

Furthermore, Kreeft suggests that the word "interesting" is often used as a way to avoid making value judgments or taking a definitive stance on a topic. By simply labeling something as "interesting," individuals can sidestep the responsibility of forming a coherent opinion or engaging in debate. This, Kreeft contends, leads to a superficial understanding of complex issues and prevents genuine intellectual growth.