It is generally agreed, that few men are made better by affluence or exaltation

It is generally agreed, that few men are made better by affluence or exaltation

Samuel Johnson, the renowned English writer, critic, and lexicographer, was a keen observer of human nature and society. In his works, Johnson often explored the impact of wealth and power on individuals, and he frequently expressed skepticism about the idea that affluence or exaltation could lead to moral improvement. Johnson's views on this topic can be seen in his famous statement, "It is generally agreed, that few men are made better by affluence or exaltation."

Johnson's skepticism about the transformative power of wealth and status can be traced back to his own experiences and observations. Despite his own struggles with poverty and illness, Johnson maintained a strong sense of moral integrity and intellectual curiosity throughout his life. He believed that true virtue and character were not dependent on external circumstances, but rather on inner qualities such as wisdom, humility, and compassion.

In Johnson's view, affluence and exaltation often had a corrupting influence on individuals, leading them to become arrogant, selfish, and disconnected from the realities of life. He saw how power and privilege could breed a sense of entitlement and moral complacency, causing individuals to lose touch with their own humanity and the needs of others. Johnson believed that true moral growth and self-improvement required struggle, adversity, and a willingness to confront one's own flaws and limitations.

Johnson's skepticism about the benefits of affluence and exaltation was also rooted in his deep sense of social justice and compassion for the less fortunate. He was acutely aware of the inequalities and injustices that existed in society, and he believed that true moral progress could only be achieved through a commitment to social reform and the promotion of equality and justice for all.