How much better a thing it is to be envied than to be pitied

How much better a thing it is to be envied than to be pitied

In the context of Herodotus, the idea that it is better to be envied than pitied can be seen through the lens of power, influence, and reputation. Herodotus, often referred to as the "Father of History," was a Greek historian who lived in the 5th century BC. His work, "The Histories," is considered one of the earliest accounts of the Greco-Persian Wars and provides valuable insights into the cultures and societies of the ancient world.

In the world of Herodotus, power and influence were highly valued, and those who possessed them were often envied by others. Leaders such as kings, generals, and statesmen were admired and respected for their ability to command armies, make important decisions, and shape the course of history. These individuals were often the subject of envy from their rivals and enemies, who sought to undermine their authority and reputation.

On the other hand, those who were pitied in Herodotus' world were often seen as weak, vulnerable, and lacking in agency. They were the victims of misfortune, betrayal, or defeat, and were often looked down upon by society. Pity was a sign of sympathy or compassion for those who had fallen on hard times, but it was also a form of condescension and judgment.

In this context, being envied was seen as a sign of success, power, and prestige. It meant that one had achieved a level of greatness or accomplishment that others could only dream of. To be envied was to be admired, respected, and feared by one's peers, and it was a mark of distinction and honor.

In contrast, being pitied was seen as a sign of weakness, failure, and shame. It meant that one had been defeated, humiliated, or disgraced in some way, and that others looked upon them with pity and scorn. To be pitied was to be seen as a victim, a loser, or a failure, and it was a mark of shame and dishonor.